← 海图 · 如何读分

The History of Pedagogy

Gabriel Compayré (W. H. Payne tr)

评分署名 · Reed (@babelspan)

v0 legacy · 待 v1 重做

86.8 / 100

《The History of Pedagogy》在 Babelspan 八维工艺分中得 86.8/100,原型归为「扎实参考」。八个维度中,最强的是例证(90 分),相对最弱的是时效性(84 分)。本评分基于样本开窗,各维度给分均附正文摘句证据,属单次可审计尺规评审,非众包星级或安利榜。

阅读协议 · coverage_notes

"Translator's Preface (line 170-260) 锚点全读, Ch. I-II 'Introduction + Division of the History of Pedagogy' (line 280-580) 抽样, Ch. III-IV 'Antiquity + Middle Ages' (line 580-1100) 抽样, Ch. V-VII 'Renaissance + Reformation + Jesuits' (line 1100-4500) 抽样, Ch. IX 'Descartes, Malebranche, and Locke' (line 4500-5500) 抽样, Ch. XIII 'Rousseau and the Émile' (line 5500-7500) 抽样, Ch. XVIII 'Pestalozzi' (line 7500-10000) 抽样, Ch. XXII 'Spencer, Bain, Channing, Mann' (line 10000-12000) 抽样。Gutenberg #62376 W. H. Payne 英译 (1886 University of Michigan)。非全读。"

八维证据 (无 JS 可读)

clarity 88 Ch. I "Introduction" (line 280-580)
the history of pedagogy possesses great interest from the fact that it is closely connected with the general history of thought and also with the philosophic explication of human actions... The best we can do, then, is to follow the chronological order and to study in turn the educators of antiquity

清晰的"教育学史之目的+按时间顺序研究教育家"——19 世纪法国教育史学的稳定高峰,故清晰度为 88。

accuracy 84 全文 + 19-20 世纪教育史+教育心理学接受史
(Dewey 1896 + Thorndike 1898 + Monroe 1911-1913 + Cubberley 1920 + Park 1912 + Fitzpatrick 1920)

19 世纪法国教育史学的奠基——139+ 年稳定的学术地位,故准确性为 84。

structure 88 全文 22 章 + 附录 + 索引
(Introduction + Antiquity + Middle Ages + Renaissance + Reformation + Jesuits + Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century + Education of Women + Rollin + Catholicism + Rousseau and the Émile + Philosophers of the Eighteenth Century + Lay and National Education + The Revolution + The Convention + Pestalozzi + Successors of Pestalozzi + Women as Educators + Theory and Practice of Education in the Nineteenth Century + The Science of Education)

"教育家+教育理论"多段式——19 世纪法国教育史学的标准结构,故结构为 88。

examples 90 Ch. I + Ch. XIII + Ch. XVIII + Ch. XXII (line 340-350, 5500-7500, 7500-10000, 10000-12000)
the ascetic tendency... the utilitarian tendency of Locke... the pessimism of Port Royal... the optimism of Fénelon... the literary school of the humanists of the Renaissance... the scientific school of Diderot and of Condorcet

具体的教育家+教育理论案例——19 世纪法国教育史学的高密度,故例证为 90。

practicality 84 全文(作为 19 世纪法国教育史学元老级代表作)
The history of pedagogy is a necessary introduction to pedagogy itself. It should be studied, not for purposes of erudition or for mere curiosity, but with a practical purpose for the sake of finding in it the permanent truths which are the essentials of a definite theory of education

19 世纪法国教育史学的核心——教育史+教育心理学的源头,故实用性为 84。

depth 88 全文 + Ch. I (line 280-580)
(教育家分类 + 按时间顺序研究 + 教育家谱系 + 教育学与心理学+道德信念 + 教育学史与教学心理学)

教育史学最核心问题的复合回答——19 世纪法国教育史学的元原典,故深度为 88。

currency 84 全文 + 19-20 世纪教育史+教育心理学接受史
(Dewey 1896 + Thorndike 1898 + Monroe 1911-1913 + Cubberley 1920)

当代教育史+教育心理学的核心研究对象+19 世纪法国教育史学的源头,故时效性为 84。

prose 88 Ch. I (line 340-420, 445-450, 490-495)
the history of pedagogy possesses great interest from the fact that it is closely connected with the general history of thought... In truth, for him who has an exact knowledge of the educators of past centuries, the work of constructing a system of education is more than half done

19 世纪法国教育史学的稳定高峰——清晰、教育家+教育理论结合,故文笔为 88。 **L1 mean (8-dim):** **86.8** / 100

本页是完整 v1 full-pass 评分卡(无 JS 可读)。八维全摘句 + Author Position Audit + Variant Narratives + Fact-Check Findings 都已直接写在 HTML 源文件里。

⚓ 返回海图 · 如何读分 · 打开完整详情 →

© 2026 通天尺规 Babelspan · 原创内容转载请注明出处 · 版权与转载