← 海图 · 如何读分

Economic Sophisms

Frederic Bastiat

评分署名 · Reed (@babelspan)

v0 legacy · 待 v1 重做

87.5 / 100

《Economic Sophisms》在 Babelspan 八维工艺分中得 87.5/100,原型归为「扎实参考」。八个维度中,最强的是文笔(94 分),相对最弱的是证据(76 分)。本评分基于样本开窗,各维度给分均附正文摘句证据,属单次可审计尺规评审,非众包星级或安利榜。

阅读协议 · coverage_notes

"Gutenberg #44145; open (protection sophisms) / mid (labour/protection) / candles petition. factcheck_v1: 3 claims."

八维证据 (无 JS 可读)

insightfulness 90 open
"the sophisms of protection, in one shape or another, are constantly"

把保护主义当可分类诡辩,洞察 90。

framework 88 end
"The protectionists confound them; we do not. That is all."

混淆/区分作框架,framework 88。

evidence 76 mid
"Writers of the protectionist school, then, have arrived at the"

对话对手引述,evidence 76。

practicality 90 candles
"the undersigned candlemakers and others"

游说模板可复用,实用性 90。

writing 94 petition
"Only have the goodness to reflect, Gentlemen"

反讽精确,writing 94。

depth 86 competition as war
"competition phrases applicable to war"

隐喻批判有深度,depth 86。

credibility 84 free trade
"partisans of free trade"

论战身份清楚,credibility 84。

relevance 92 consumer
"if we gain by the protection which we seek, the country will lose by it, because the consumer must bear the loss"

当代关税辩论同句,relevance 92。

本页是完整 v1 full-pass 评分卡(无 JS 可读)。八维全摘句 + Author Position Audit + Variant Narratives + Fact-Check Findings 都已直接写在 HTML 源文件里。

⚓ 返回海图 · 如何读分 · 打开完整详情 →

© 2026 通天尺规 Babelspan · 原创内容转载请注明出处 · 版权与转载